Being Human:

A Theological Anthropology

Robert Hughes, Psy.D.

Evangelical Free Church of Mt. Shasta

Adult Sunday School

January 28, 2007

Being Contingent

Genesis Chapter 1 – Chapter 2: 3


Introduction: The purpose of this course is to prayerfully examine the Biblical teaching on what it means to be human as a foundation for living lives as bearers of God's image.  A theological anthropology will inform how we are to live as social, personal, sexual, emotional, and spiritual beings, within the context of family and community.


A.                Logos: The revealed meaning of something; a system of organizing principles.  For example, the logos of society or the society logos we call "sociology.

B.                 Theos: God.  Anthropos: Human

C.                 Thus, a “theological anthropology” is an understanding of what it means to be human from the perspective of understanding God.

Where to Begin: 

A.                The theological starting point of the Old Testament is…

B.                 The theological starting point for our own lives is the point at which we have had a personal experience of the Word of God in Jesus Christ.  All of our study and theologizing is done as a response to the call which we have received.  All we can “know” of God is that which He has revealed to us.

Being Contingent: We begin with Genesis 1 where we hope to discover some foundational principles about being human in the account of God’s creation of the human.  The first thing we find is that human being is contingent being.  This is the difference between a theological anthropology versus a non-theological anthropology.

A.                Verses 1 & 2: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.  Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.”

B.                 The theological starting point for our own lives is the point at which we have had a personal experience of the Word of God in Jesus Christ.  All of our study and theologizing is done as a response to the call which we have received.  All we can “know” of God is that which He has revealed to us. 

Being Contingent: We begin with Genesis 1 where we hope to discover some foundational principles about being human in the account of God’s creation of the human.  The first thing we find is that human being is contingent being.  This is the difference between a theological anthropology versus a non-theological anthropology.

A.                Verses 1 & 2: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.  Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.” 

a.      God created the cosmos ex nihilo, “out of nothing.” 

b.      God is the foundation for all that exists.

B.                 Verses 3 – 5: “And God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light.  God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness.  God called the light ‘day,’ and the darkness he called ‘night.’ And there was evening, and there was morning – the first day.”

a.      Ontology: the logos of the Ontic or that which has “being.” Notice, God creates and that which he creates is called “good.”

        i.      The ontological precedes the ethical, and actuality precedes possibility.  That which is, is the foundation for                   that which can or should be.

                                                                       ii.      God created light, He did not create darkness.  Before God created light there was no darkness, there was just nothing.  Darkness has no meaning except that it is the absence of light.  In creating light, God differentiated it from the non-light (darkness).

C.                 Verses 24 – 27: “And God said, ‘Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: live-stock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind.’  And it was so.  God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds.  And God saw that it was good.  Then God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.’  So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he crated him; male and female He created them.”

a.      “The solidarity of the sixth day.” (Thielicke)

b.      Being human is necessarily to have creaturely existence.  We have bodily existence in a form similar to and consistent with all other creatures.  Example, Baby Fay.

c.       Creaturely existence is a necessary-but-not sufficient aspect of being human.  The phrase “in the image and likeness of God” specifies the qualitative difference between the human and the non-human creature.

d.     “’Being human’” is therefore contingent upon a source and power of life outside of or beyond creaturely existence itself – this is a theological assumption grounded in the doctrine of creation ‘in the image and likeness of God.” (Anderson, expanded course syllabus, 1995).

e.      “Thus the fact that I am born and die, that I eat and drink and sleep, that I develop and maintain myself; that beyond this I assert myself in the face of others, and even physically, propagate my species; that I enjoy and work and play in fashion and possess; that I acquire and have and exercise powers; that I take part in all the work of the race, either accomplished or in process of accomplishment; that in all this, I satisfy religious needs and can realize religious possibilities, and that in it all I fulfill my aptitudes as an understanding and thinking, willing and feeing being – all this as such is not my humanity.  It is only the field on which human being either takes place or does not take place as history.  As the encounter of the I and Thou; the field on which it is revealed or obscured that “I am as Thou art.”  That I exist on this field, and do so in a particular way, does not of itself mean that I am human.” (K. Barth, Church Dogmatics, III/2, p. 249).

f.        Human life as gift and task

                                                                          i.      “It is generally characteristic of the Old Testament that it does not make statements about “nature” and “being” but statements about “the task” or a “relationship.”  As the being who is like God, man is supposed to do something…[the image of God] endows him with a “gift” and a “task.”

g.      Genesis 2: 1 – 3:  Called into the “seventh day.”  Human beings were the final glorious act which crowned God’s creation.

                                                                          i.      That which God thought first, he created last.  Like a chocolate cake.

                                                                       ii.      Immediately we are to enter into the “seventh day” or “God’s rest.”

D.                The Problem with a Theological Anthropology

a.      How are humans to have a logos of Theos?  How are we to understand the logos of Anthropos in view of our depravity?

                                                                          i.      “And the difficulty which confronts us is this.  In these circumstances how can we possibly reach a doctrine of man in the sense of his creaturely essence, of his human nature as such?  For what we recognize to be human nature is nothing other than the disgrace which covers his nature; his inhumanity, perversion and corruption.  If we try to deny this or to tone it down, we have not yet understood the full import of the truth that for the reconciliation of man with God nothing more nor less was needed than the death of the Son of God, and for the manifestation of this reconciliation of man with God nothing more nor less than the resurrection of the Son of Man, Jesus Christ.  But if we know man only in the corruption and distortion of his being, how can we even begin to answer the question about his creaturely nature?”(Barth, C.D., III/2, p. 27).

                                                                       ii.      John 1: 1 & 14: “In the beginning was the Word (Logos), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  The Word became flesh…”

1.      Jesus reveals to us the true nature of both divinity (God) and humanity.


Going Deeper

A.                What are some practical implications of the principle that “the ontological precedes the ethical?”

a.      How should we understand the Ten Commandments, and all of God’s laws, given this principle?

b.      How might this principle affect what things we choose to dwell, reflect, or meditate on?

B.                 In view of our contingency upon God, where are we to find the source and center of our lives?

a.      How does this perspective differ from the general philosophy of the world?

b.      What does it require of a person to acknowledge God as the source and center of their life?

C.                 What aspects of your life as a gift from God give you the greatest sense of gratitude?

a.      What aspects of your life as a task from God give you the greatest sense of purpose and meaning?

D.                As the Word of God, how does Jesus reveal the nature of God to us today?

a.      As the Word become flesh, how does Jesus reveal the true nature of human being to us today?

b.      What are some aspects of Jesus’ life that you would like to use as a personal model for your own life today and this week?



New American Standard Bible (NASB)
Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation